Silverfort closes the identity security gaps your IAM stack cannot reach. Extend MFA and real-time access controls across Active Directory, legacy protocols, and service accounts, without changing servers, apps, or user workflows – at scale.
Silverfort extends MFA and access controls to AD resources, legacy protocols, and service accounts. Cloudcomputing implements it with an IAM-led rollout (architecture, sequencing, and ownership) so you gain fast, measurable coverage without app changes or user disruption.
Silverfort extends MFA across AD resources “regardless of the system, interface or protocol”, bringing consistent enforcement to areas that typically fall outside modern MFA coverage.
Silverfort’s Universal MFA is designed to avoid modifying servers or applications, using its Runtime Access Protection (RAP) approach to integrate without infrastructure rework.
It discovers, classifies, and maps AD service accounts, then applies “virtual fencing” policies that confine accounts to intended destinations and block out-of-scope use.
Silverfort positions the platform around real-time detection and policy-based blocking of malicious access, targeting common identity-led attack stages such as privilege escalation and ransomware.
Control hybrid access without changing apps or servers
Identity Controls That Reach Further
Find answers to common questions about Silverfort.
Silverfort is an identity security platform that extends authentication and access controls to areas where traditional IAM and MFA coverage often stops, particularly Active Directory resources, legacy authentication paths, and service accounts.
Organisations with AD-centric or hybrid estates, legacy applications, multiple authentication protocols, and a meaningful volume of service accounts typically see the strongest value, because these areas are common enforcement gaps.
In most cases, no. It is commonly used to extend existing IdP/MFA investments to resources they cannot natively protect. Any consolidation decisions are usually made after coverage is stabilised.
Silverfort implementations are generally planned to minimise disruption and avoid application rewrites. The goal is to increase enforcement coverage without creating large infrastructure change programmes.
It helps bring service accounts under governance by identifying them, mapping where they authenticate, and applying policies that limit use to approved systems and expected behaviour.
By adding enforcement to authentication paths that attackers commonly exploit for escalation and movement, and by enabling real-time policy decisions on risky authentication activity.
Cloudcomputing typically covers architecture and design, scope definition and rollout sequencing, integration with the existing identity stack, and operationalisation so controls remain effective beyond go-live.
Rollouts are usually phased: starting with high-risk, high-value access paths, validating user impact, and expanding coverage in controlled steps based on dependencies and organisational readiness.
Value is typically demonstrated once priority AD access paths and targeted service accounts are under enforcement and visibility, with additional coverage delivered in subsequent phases. Exact timelines depend on scope and complexity.
It supports Zero Trust objectives by expanding continuous verification to parts of the environment that often remain outside enforcement, improving consistency of access policy across hybrid estates.
Common indicators include expanded MFA/enforcement coverage, reduced high-risk authentication paths, improved service-account containment, fewer access-related exceptions, and clearer evidence for audits and investigations.
