Modernization and Consolidation (Reduce platforms, standardise integrations)

The Problem

Multiple MFT tools, scripts, and gateways create cost, complexity, and inconsistent controls. 

Teams maintain overlapping platforms, duplicate integrations, and varied operating procedures. 

Standardisation is difficult, and evidence is fragmented.

Diagram showing MFT tool sprawl across platforms and scripts compared to a consolidated Axway MFT operating model with standardised controls.

 

How we solve it: Rationalise the landscape, migrate flows, and standardise operating models on Axway MFT.

We run a consolidation programme that reduces platforms while preserving business continuity and improving control coverage.

  • Landscape assessment
    Inventory tools and flows, identify duplication, and prioritise migrations by risk and business criticality.
  • Migration waves
    Migrate flows using standard templates and controlled cutovers, validating success and decommissioning legacy paths.
  • Operating model standardisation
    Define ownership, runbooks, SLAs, and change control for the consolidated platform.

Flow showing MFT consolidation from assessment and prioritisation through migration waves, validation, decommissioning, and standardised operations.

 

Expected outcome

  • Lower TCO through fewer platforms and reduced duplicated effort
  • Fewer platforms to manage with standardised operations and controls
  • Stronger standardisation across security, monitoring, and evidence
  • Reduced operational risk by removing fragile scripts and unmanaged gateways

 

Quick Answers

Why consolidate MFT platforms?
To reduce cost and complexity while improving security consistency and operational reliability.

What is the main risk in consolidation?
Business disruption during migration; this is managed through phased waves and validation.

What improves immediately after consolidation?
Control consistency, monitoring visibility, and audit evidence quality.